3 Comments

No. Tim. There was vast damage in a populated area where there were kids. Some people are asking the right questions. Were a lot of kids killed? Where is an accounting? Should we believe the MSM low ball estimates of the dead? Or keep an open mind that 1000s might have been killed, even incinerated? Should we ignore the anomalous fire damage reports that raise the suspicion of Directed Energy Weapons, most likely microwaves in this case? We know the 'powers that be" lead by the World Economic Forum claim the "planet" needs to be saved from climate change caused by too many people and WEF lead real estate operators want to redevelop the burned land for billions of $$$$ in profit.

Expand full comment

I most certainly did NOT START with the idea it was DEWs. Quite the opposite. I assumed that DEWs were a guard rail designed to put tin foil hats on conspiracy theorists focusing at first on all the bureaucratic "errors" which intensified the disaster. Observing the anomalous damage made me consider DEWs likely.

Expand full comment

No one wants this to be true except perhaps the people that planned and executed it. Normalizing population reduction at the same time real estate is stolen.

Expand full comment