Predictive Programming is Not Evidence of Higher or Lower Powers Manipulating World Events.

Metascript vs Synchromysticm vs Coincidence Theory: Let's debate these on their merits.

Here are four competing interpretations for what the media calls “eerie coincidences” concerning the news media and what just happened in the movies, comics, and other mass entertainment, what is commonly termed “predictive programming”:

1. Coincidence: These are just coincidences to which conspiracists ascribe too much significance.

2. Synchromystic (higher powers): These are synchronicities and are evidence that powers “higher than man” are responsible.

3. “Revelation of the Method" (lower powers): These are placed there by evil men in order to get our consent for what they are about to do. This is often attended by beliefs that our consumption of the entertainment media and its eerily predictive programming is “manifesting” the events.

4. Metascript: Man, not higher powers, not mere random change, are behind what we experience as coincidental alignments between entertainment and current events. The synchronized entertainment and fake news events are part of a bigger script, a “metascript” in which our history is directed by mass media (using fake news, media fakery, and other forms of propaganda).

Which one is correct?

• The first one, coincidence, is contradicted by repeated evidence of intentionality. Anyone dismissing what we discuss as a mere coincidence is uninformed and unresearched on the matter.

• The second explanation assumes the existence of a higher power that influences movies, literature, and the arts in general. This “higher than man” power is directing the directors. This explanation views the synchronized entertainment and fake news events as evidence that we live in a simulation or a video game. The problem with this proposition is that the events foreshadowed in the entertainment are fake. What would cause higher powers to reinforce pre-planned government psyops with subtle clues in movies?

• The third explanation here suggests that there are “cosmic laws” that allow the bad guys (lower powers) to do bad things as long as they tell their victims first in the movies, thereby gaining their consent to be victimized. This allows the perpetrators to sleep at night knowing that the Universe won’t punish them with bad karma. The problem with this proposition is that it’s made-up nonsense. There is no “cosmic law” about “revelation of the method” that blocks bad karma, if that’s even a thing. The main issue with this interpretation is that it presumes the psyops are real events, not hoaxes, not simulations. After all, what bad karma would one incur if nobody dies at the fake events?

• The Metascript concept includes the understanding that news media utilizes fakery and psyops to influence the masses, and that the entertainment reinforces the illusions via Predivtive and Concurrent Programming. The consistent and timely alignment between real-time fake events and what is happening concurrently in the movies proves, unequivocally, that there is a very human agenda to the synchronized entertainment and news events. “Higher powers” would not be “inspiring” artists, directors, and writers to inadvertently create an echo chamber of ideas, narratives, and events that happen to mirror fake news events. “Lower powers” would not be concerned about karma if all we’re talking about is propaganda tactics.

Coincidental Drills

Here’s another important consideration: in addition to media forshadowing or mirroring real-time events, there are often drills contemporaneous with the fake event. For example, the American Airlines flight hitting the Blackhawk helicopter occurred in the context of a doomsday drill; 9/11/01 happened during dozens of overlapping drills; Parkland High was conducting evacuation drills on the day of the shooting. This contradicts the notion of “higher powers” influencing the arts with prophetic outcomes, and it provides a parallel set of coincidental alignments between simulations and news events.

Media psyops (psychological operations) include the simulation in the news, the mirroring of the event in the movies (both forshadowing and real-time alignments), and similar mass casualty drills in the vicinity at the same time. This is a pattern which goes back as far as one cares to look. It’s implemented every day.

To what end? What’s the point?

The simulated events become our shared History.

• George Orwell, 1984: “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

• Winston Churchill: “History is written by the victors.”

• Napoleon Bonaparte: “History is the version of past events that people have decided to agree upon.”

Here’s a chart with three columns, PREDICTIVE, CONCURRENT, and DRILLS:

Notes:

• Predictive programming is the theory that media embeds symbolic hints of future events, conditioning the public for what’s to come.

• Concurrent alignments are less about foreshadowing and more about real-time mirroring between media and news cycles, sometimes interpreted as coordinated or synchronistic.

• Drills refer to exercises or simulations that, in retrospect, appear to match or anticipate real events, fueling speculation about foreknowledge or orchestration.

Of the four, the only explanation that accounts for concurrent drills and entertainment, along with the fake news narratives out of which our shared history is constructed, is the Metascript theory that answers why and how, based on evidence and reasoning. What we posit here is a framework that unifies a broad range of observations and facts. Unlike the mystical or simulation theory-based explanations, the Metascript is testable and falsifiable, meaning it can be supported or refuted through experiments and observation.

I’m willing to entertain debates on the matter, but I want to note that I have been providing a Steel Man argument for the other side to represent what they are positing. However, the only attempts at refuting Metascript Theory I have heard have been weak, Straw Man arguments which have often been used to dismiss “predictive programming” but have no refutation for “concurrent programming.” Moreover, to supply an unfalsifiable “higher power” or hidden “lower powers” into the debate is a non-starter.

Conclusion

The Metascript theory is the only interpretation that:

• Accounts for predictive, concurrent, and drill-based synchronicities.

• Is based on observable patterns, not mystical beliefs.

• Views history as media-constructed simulation, shaped by psychological operations.

The other theories either rely on blind chance, unverifiable forces, or magical thinking. Metascript theory, by contrast, is rational, falsifiable, and unifying—grounded in the study of propaganda, pattern recognition, and media synchronization.

Thank you for subscribing.

Tim Ozman,

IPR Host