The term Mediation here refers to media Influence on perception; Mainstream Mediation in this context refers to how the media doesn’t just report on reality, but actively mediates (filters, frames, and programs) our entire perception of it. Its intended purpose is not to inform our minds, but to conform them to a prefabricated historic timeline.
All media consumers are subject to Mainstream Mediation (MSM) but there are three distinct modes of processing information relating to the observer’s point of view:
In addition to the MSM perspective, there is a subset which we term (MSM+), and the third category exists outside the MSM framework (MSM-).
MSM and MSM+ co-exist in a belief system that the MSM- explicitly rejects.
MSM and MSM+ reflect a passive acceptance of events as presented, while MSM- reflects an active and skeptical approach to events which are analyzed rather than automatically accepted.
Let’s examine the three possible ways one can process media:
Mainstream Mediation (MSM) represents the universe of ideas as presented by all mass media, including both mainstream and alternative. This is the dominant paradigm as broadcast, as published, and presented to us, as we are indoctrinated to accept. Everyone begins with this as the default perspective on consensus reality. The MSM perspective automatically rejects alternative viewpoints as “conspiracy theory”.
Mainstream Mediation PLUS (MSM+) is the subset of the MSM closed informational system containing alternative media and conspiracy theories. They accept the essential reality of the reported events. Their worldview is still within the MSM closed informational system. However, they believe the mainstream is lying or covering up the “truth,” so they attempt to correct the lies. Those operating on this pretense are known as conspiracy theorists or “truthers.”
Truthers automatically assume Mainstream Mediation misrepresents the facts about reported events. They believe the news happened, just not as reported. Their disagreement is about who is to blame. A conspiracy theory is an attempt to replace the assumed falsehood with an explanation that fits their alternative, anti-mainstream perspective. The “plus” in MSM+ refers to the additional narratives and assumptions piled atop the MSM version of events.
For example:
MSM reports that Charlie Kirk was shot by a Leftist. The Truthers immediately come up with conspiracy theories that start with the assumption Kirk was assassinated, but shift the blame to anyone or anything other than the shooter. The “second shooter” or “inside job” is a typical MSM+ narrative.
Whether they blame an exploding microphone, a palm pistol, or an unknown exotic weapon, all MSM+ explanations start with the MSM assumption that he died, but provide a myriad of alternative culprits. MSM+ effectively turns a “what actually happened/ what is it?” question into a “who did it?” question.
Mainstream Mediation MINUS (MSM-)
Of the three points of view, the only skeptical one is MSM-. The minus represents the subtractive view that doesn’t take the mainstream version at face value. Instead, it subtracts what can’t be verified or safely assumed to be true. The MSM perspective processes all televised news as fundamentally real; MSM+ processes the same news as real with a different culprit; MSM- questions whether the event actually happened as broadcast.
MSM- is not built upon the appeal to the authority fallacy; the MSM and MSM+ are.
Example:
The MSM- point of view questions whether Charlie Kirk was assassinated at all.
Summary:
We are all mediated by default. MSM is part of our environment. It puts media consumers into the same worldview. The consensus is built upon agreements. MSM and MSM+ both constitute a consensus.
“History is lies agreed upon”-- Napoleon Bonaparte.
The MSM and MSM+ agree on the alleged reality of reported events, but disagree on details. The MSM- point of view disagrees that reported events can be assumed to be true. It relies on facts. Until that can be established, arguing over details is pointless.
MSM and MSM+ begin with an appeal to authority. To understand the appeal to authority fallacy, consider these key points:
It occurs when someone argues that a claim is true simply because an authority figure endorses it.
This fallacy ignores the need for evidence and reasoning to support the claim.
Just because an authority believes something does not guarantee its truth.
Critical thinking requires evaluating the argument based on evidence, not just authority.
The MSM- position seeks corroborating evidence from multiple reliable sources and accounts for “news bending”, influence operations, psyops, media fakery, the presence of predictive and/or concurrent programming, and pattern recognition.
Pattern recognition is a key element to MSM-, which recognizes that all staged, faked, and simulated events exist within the same context. The sequence of fake events superimposed over our timeline can be described as a Metascript. The worldview arrived at by combining the Metascript with reality is the World Stage, a fusion of fiction with reality.
The world stagers are prejudiced. They automatically believe their own side explanation for events and they automatically disbelieve the other side that’s prejudiced. They are credulous about their own side they automatically believe they’re incredulous about the other side. And what credulity refers to here is how willing you are to believe something and in this case we’re talking about personal incredulity as a reason to reject the other side. This is not the same as skepticism.
So if you’re incredulous about something you wave it away just hand-wave it perhaps you build a straw man and you dismiss it. That is not the same thing as skepticism which requires suspending judgment until you have more facts and then as a more informed observer you look at the facts and you determine whether or not you think it’s legitimate or not, but you’re not constructing a straw man or flippantly rejecting something it’s actually from a perspective of being informed.
So I’d like to point out that informed disbelief weighs more than low-information belief or auto-belief. Someone who just believes the headlines doesn’t have the intellectual high ground over someone who has thoroughly researched the matter before arriving at a judgment. So the prejudiced nature towards the other side and the incredulity towards the other side are used instead of actual skepticism which is where we are coming from.
So the off-world stages automatically consider potential fakery on both sides, and we question their starting premise. Is the thing they’re fighting for even real? Are they fighting over a PSYOP? Have they assumed the premise established by the news that this thing happened? And operating from that premise, they’re engaged in some left versus right ideological warfare, which is generally the case.
So the off-world stage or the MSM minus perspective is equally skeptical of both sides. Not incredulous. We suspend judgment until facts to support our claims.
MSM and MSM+ exist within a closed system referred to here as the “World Stage.”
This is the version of the world as interpreted through the lens of Mainstream Mediation. It builds upon the previous news cycles with a presupposition that these reflect reality rather than distort it. The consensus worldview is formed without accounting for or referencing media fakery, psyops, and the long-term effects of accumulated news cycles corrupted by staged events. This “bending” of the news, or “news bending” is inherent to MSM and MSM+.
Over the decades, our history has diverged from an objective, fact-based assessment of the past. This isn’t a bug; it’s a feature. MSM and MSM+ are specifically designed to bend history itself. The map given to media consumers is not the territory. The World Stage is a version of the world the masses are programmed to exist within. It’s a frame of reference, a point of view, and a system of beliefs.
To live within that model, the World Stager is required to be a believer, rather than a knower. They react to the scripted events with a tacit acceptance of their fundamental reality. MSM true believers are programmed to contextualize their worldview within the World Stage model.
By contrast, the MSM- perspective, factoring in structural, systemic fakery in mass media, rejects the MSM belief system. Instead, it leads to Informed Non-Belief. The MSM- point of view is grounded in reality, aware of the World Stage as a model, and is detached from it.
This “Off-World Stage” point of view rejects the programming, choosing to analyze and deconstruct the World Stage rather than exist within it. Here, programming refers to the scripted events that believers react to and participate in.
The continuous sequence of scripted events constitutes The Metascript.
The Metascripted collection of stories built upon stories constitutes our history.
Both MSM and MSM+ exist within a prefabricated historical timeline and in ignorance of systemic media fakery.
World stage constitutes a closed system containing both mainstream and alternative that is considered one perspective. Off world stage is a separate one. What this perspective, the off world stage perspective adds to its interpretation of what we see in media is an awareness of news bending which is the influence of staged events on the real news, how the real news bends or warps around the simulation. History-bending which is the cumulative effect of fake news over time and how that affects the present with regard to how you interpret current events. If your interpretation of current events is not inclusive of many decades of previous current events being faked, then your perspective isn’t grounded in reality but rather in the world stage, which is a simulation that we internalize and superimpose over reality.
This perspective also takes into account media fakery itself, the techniques, technologies, how it’s done. Crisis actors are just the tip of the iceberg, but it’s awareness of fake ability. What can be faked? What can be faked at scale? What can’t be faked is a better question today. Also, this perspective takes into account predictive and concurrent programming, which refers to those instances where entertainment correlates its messaging with the present fake event, which is always a propaganda event. A PSYOP is a PR stunt and it’s used to advance some propaganda, some event that will now become a fixture in our history because the fake events become, fake news becomes fake history. You could look at a news cycle as a page in the history book and our history book is full of what I would call systemic fakery.
So the off-world stage perspective has the situational awareness to include in its assessments a collusion that can be demonstrated to exist between government, entertainment, and news media. By contrast, the world stage perspective is bifurcated into a pro versus anti dialectic on every main issue. Mainstream and alternative are part of what you could consider a duopoly. The two sides are triangulated against one another and they have a corresponding position to one another on every major issue creating this constant back and forth. This result of triangulation, while they ignore the central manipulator. So it’s left and right, misandry misogyny, anti-racist versus xenophobic, progressive versus traditional, science versus religion and this breakdown into two compartments is the fundamental split that every psyop is built upon. Every fake event, every fake person, every staged event is introduced in such a way that the two sides will fight.
And you do have the political horseshoe on the diagram as well which overlaps the triangulation and the far left and the far right. The woke left and the woke right have identical ideologies but they just differ on the scapegoat whether it’s critical race theory or critical Israel theory. It’s structurally the same and wokeism also would include Red Pill Woke, but their central presser is a little more mystified, like Jesuits or Illuminati. They don’t actually name a specific nation. And Red Pill Woke and Woke Right are actually part of the same subset. All conspiracy theories are a subset of J-Pill. Behind all the conspiracy narratives, eventually it does go point to that one spot every single time. And that’s built into it so again conspiracy theories are there to lead you into work right politics.
Fakeablility
What are the questions that we would ask as to whether the story is viable?
First of all, you would ask, is it fakeable? Fakeability is one of our key concepts here.
We don’t say everything is fake. We’re not starting with generalizing from our observations.
We are stating the fact that fake events exist and are presented through the news media. Simulated events do exist. That doesn’t mean everything’s fake.
We consider each event with a skeptical approach. We ask, is it fakeable? How is it faked? Could the event be simulated with a squib, with CGI, with any other type of hypothetical prop or special effect? Because if it’s fakeable, then it could be fake. There’s room for doubt.
As a rule, if it can be faked in the movies, it can be faked on the news.
Additionally, we examine each event in the context in which events are routinely faked. We recognize news-bending and, if you consider 70 years of consecutive psyops in a sequence on a singular script superimposed over our consensus version of reality, history-bending.
If you assume that it’s real until proven fake, that’s mainstream. Real until proven fake is the position of the believer.
MSM minus says it should be considered possibly fake if fakeable. Fake if fakeable until proven real. Meaning if doubt has been raised, then they have to prove it’s real. By doubt, we refer to any hoax-indicator that raises a reasonable doubt.
The burden of proof to accept what the media is reporting, and this includes alternative media, lies with them. Any hoax indicators shift the burden away from the news consumer.
Hoax indicators shift that burden of proof back on the media:
predictive programming,
concurrent programming,
deviations from standard protocol with law enforcement and emergency personnel, funeral & autopsy arrangements
the event unfolds according to a predictable template
psyop actors from other events play a role
immediate political agenda triggering left versus right political circus
Until the News Believer can address each of these and refute that they are indeed indicators of media fakery, they have no truth claim.
Hoax indicators must be refuted before one can stand upon a mainstream knowledge claim.
The convergence of real and fake occurs in the presentation of staged events as they are disseminated through the usual channels. News media, entertainment, celebrity influencers, and all other propaganda conduits amplify the stories, which generate predictable reactions.
The two sides of the World State respond uniformly; each accepting the reality of the event, and each blaming the other for causing it. The mutual scapegoating is the result of mainstream media versus alternative media’s triangulation by a central manipulator. Mainstream is “pro” and alternative is “anti” the premise as presented.
These predictable ideological battles over each successive Psyop is how the public consumes each staged event. This consumption process begins with the premise established in the report, primarily that the event happened. The debates and arguments are what make the staged event real in the minds of the participants
By examing the staged spectacles in a sequence, in their continuity, these can be discerned as existing on a timeline. Consider this hypothetical:
Right now, we can look back Season 2026: Episode 6 (for June). The Psyops of the month revolve around high-profile killings that have been made into activist causes. Earlier episodes this season involved a trip around the moon, riots over immigration enforcement, and political fanatics worshiping a gold statue of their leader.
Each of these events contained the typical (predictable) hoax indicators. These amount to evidence of pre-planning and reveal the coordination between psyops in the news, and mass entertainment.
Season 2026: Episode 9 (for September) has already been written, rehearsed, and is coordinated with upcoming releases in mass entertainment.
As with a schedule of television shows, the Metascript is on a program, future psychological operations necessarily exist on a calendar.
This calendar of events constitutes a timeline that synchronizes with our lived experiences in the present time. We experience these events as spontaneous happenings, as breaking news, but in reality, these are contrived and premeditated events. Moreover, these events on this separate timeline merge with our consensus agreement about the past.
Thus, the fake timeline merges with the real one through our concious participation and interaction with it. The two timelines become one because to the World Stager, the staged events are assumed to be real and isolated happenings, intead of simulated events existing inserted into our timeline by deception.
All Psyops Occur In The Same Fictional Universe
Spotting a staged event in isolation is a no-brainer at this point. The next leap forward recognizing these exist on a timeline and recognizing how far back this process goes. This inclues the recognition that our worldview is the result of long-term distortion, or History Bending.
To exist in the present without knowledge of what came before, of what didn’t actually happen, is to live in in the fusion of the two timelines.
Until one discerns the two timelines as distinct, one is programmable by each incoming staged event, as the simulated events presume the authenticity of past staged events. The fake news of today builds upon the fake news of yesterday; each news cycle becomes another page in the history books.
To take an oppositional position to the mainstream one on any issue, to become an “anti” is to participate in the simulation. The pro and the anti position mutually reinforce the assumed reality of each fake.
The deprogrammed are those who not only each to be programmable by incoming simulations, but who also contextualize these in that sequence of psyops extending far into the past. Deprogramming occurs when one decouples their individual worldview from the false timeline of events while remaining firmly planted on the real one.
Many truthers begin to discern the glitches in the simulated news and mistake these for evidence that the world itself is a simulation. They falsely equate simulated news with simulated reality because they mistake the map for the territory, leading them to interpret errors in the map with errors in reality. We have corrected this misunderstanding by demonstrating the simulation to be an internal, mental construct resulting from consuming worldview-bending lies.
Each simulated event in the false timeline of events is argued over by the triangulated factions until it permeates the entire media ecosystem. Participating in these with the operational premise they are actual events, is what creates and maintains what eventually becomes established history.
History is a record of what is known and what is believed to be true. The believers in the false timeline, the Metascript, are like believers in a religion with total faith in scripture.
Metascripture, conveyed via the News-Testament, creates a paradigm that approximates a religious one.
Until one recognizes and rejects participation in the Pro vs Anti and adopts the Non position, one is part of the process of history fabrication. The entertainment and the news are so intertwined they cannot be considered separate.
So what is this really pointing out? Well, it’s pointing out that the fake news events done at behest of government by media are also supplemented by entertainment that prepares you to accept it.
So now you have the world stage map. You have it divided into MSM and MSM plus because the mainstream mediation includes all the entertainment as well as the education. And anything really that’s platformed on major platforms for entertainment or news. The mainstream dominant paradigm as broadcast is MSM. The conspiracy version is MSM Plus. So they think that there’s a cover up or not all the information is out or something’s been hidden. So they add on to it. So a conspiracy theory does not subtract. It offers a separate story which has built in other assumptions. And that would be the plus. So it’s additional.
The off world stage perspective by comparison is subtractive. So MSM Minus which means instead of adding to what is presented to make it palatable we subtract what can be verified. So instead of becoming alternative believers we become informed non-believers. It’s the rejection of a story that’s incomplete rather than filling in the blanks which is what conspiracy theories all do.
Now you’ll see the two timelines so the twin timeline convergence refers to the real timeline and the fake event timeline which tells us becomes then history. Now the fake event time referred to as the meta script, it includes all of the fake events that will be inserted into the world stage. And these fake events that exist on a separate timeline are part of the same sequence. They exist in the same fictional universe. They build on one another. If you have a fake mass shooting event, and a few years later, another one, they will often reference one another because they’re part of the same operation. So I refer to this as the Metascript because it contains all these other scripted events.
So the Metascript enters into the two sides, pro and the anti, and they fight over who did it. But they agree that it was. So as you can see, the Metascript fake event timeline merges with and fake plus real events constitute our history. So our frame of reference is a prospect that includes the assumption that previous fake events were real. That is built into the system. You think the real timeline is unwritten, but the meta script exists in the future. It consists of our future history which is being faked for us through the new cycles and then it becomes our shared history.
So the twin timeline convergence refers to the merging of real and fake. The believers, the off-world stage perspective does not participate in the convergence. We don’t allow them to combine the two. We act and retroactively what fake events we may have accepted as real in the past as we decouple our perception from this murder. So the off-world stage perspective is only possible if you are aware of the sequence of fake events, not individual psyops, but the systemic fakery itself, because that’s what we’re actually revealing here, is that this is a feature of what media is and what it does. These are not anomalies. It is in fact systemic to it.
Okay next after timeline convergence let’s talk about the two perspectives. We already covered this for the most part but I just want to point out that everything in the world stage circle is MSM. MSM Plus is a subset. It’s not outside of it. Pro anti the off world stage perspective is anti pro just like the antis are but we’re also anti anti. Our position on every issue that’s brought into this triangulation dynamic is non. It’s no longer acceptable to claim to be let’s say an anti fill in the blank because once you take an anti position now you’re in the political horseshoe with a bunch of people who don’t know anything’s fake. So you essentially have just joined in with the collective of the deceived. And without their participation in the fake events, these things wouldn’t become real. It does require your engagement.
So taking an anti-position is fundamentally and ethically no different than taking a pro-position. Again, it’s a controlled opposition, the entire thing. All conspiracy theories are in fact subplots within the meta script itself so that’s how fundamental our differences are.
The off-world stage perspective is non on everything so here again to clarify MSM and MSM plus have a common agreement that the events from the meta script are real so all the events here on the fake event timeline are processed as real whether you’re mainstream or alternative they just disagree on the cause or the party to blame. There could be some wildfires msm will say climate change msm plus will say space lasers they both agree it happened. The skeptical approach would be um can we accept the story at face value. And oftentimes we cannot, that this is something intentionally planted for the two sides to fight over.
So the MSM minus off world stage perspective sees all of this. We see the convergence of the twin timelines. We see the news becoming history and our awareness of it allows us to step outside of it. And to not get caught up in any pro or anti position. So our awareness situationally includes news bending, history bending, systemic fakery, the psyop and hoax indicators, those clues that would make us suspicious or doubtful, predictive and concurrent programming, and general pattern literacy are all included in our assessment of media events, which means that in addition to looking at the present event in question, we have in our field of awareness, a history of fake events. So our skepticism is backed by empirical research. So we’re not flippant about calling things fake.
History Bending
The concept of “history bending” represents a shift from the traditional understanding of history as a record of the past to history as a proactively manufactured media illusion. According to the sources, history is no longer just something that is recorded; it is something that is scripted, scheduled, and simulated to manage the “human herd”.
The Proactive Manufacturing of Reality
Unlike “retconning”—which involves editing the past or burning books—history bending is proactive. It involves the creation of a “metascript” where world events are planned years or even decades in advance. As the source explains:
“The manufacturing of history is proactive. It’s not retconning. It’s not editing the past and burning books. No, they’re proactively creating history by faking or simulating events on the world stage, which get accepted as real”.
These simulated events, which range from mass casualty incidents to political theater, are inserted into the news cycle to dominate public consciousness and become part of a “consensus reality”. This process is described as a form of “timeline hijacking” that grants the “world government ultimate creative control over our internalized model of the world”.
The Role of Predictive Programming
A vital component of history bending is predictive programming, where the masses are acclimated to narratives and characters through fiction—movies, books, and video games—before they “appear” in the real world. This use of media serves to open the “Overton window,” defining the boundaries of what the public perceives as possible.
Acclimatization: “We are acclimated to the stories and the characters before they actually exist on the world stage as real, real people, real events”.
Concerted Messaging: The “metascript” uses repeated themes, names, and symbols across different media platforms to create an “inescapable echo chamber”. For example, the sources point to the repeated use of the name “Nicholas” or themes of “victory” across various 2024 news cycles and entertainment releases.
An Internalized Truman Show
Ultimately, history bending functions as a modern form of mass mind control, replacing traditional state religions with a “mainstream mediation” that provides society with its myths, miracles, and martyrs. The source notes that even the Wizard of Oz in a modern film adaptation summarizes this reality:
“The truth is not a thing of fact or reason. The truth is just what everyone agrees on“.
By reacting in uniform to perceived universal threats—such as pandemics or climate change—the public becomes part of an “immersive illusion” or an “internalized Truman Show”. In this framework, the distinction between mainstream and alternative media is a duopoly; both sides operate from the same premise that the manufactured events are real, thereby maintaining the fictional universe of the “metascript”.So newsbending is part of our perception here when we look at news media we know that they’re bending it they’re distracting us they’re distorting it but then because even regular run-of-the-mill truthers have figured out psyops bending news cycles distractions but the part that the subplot obsessed conspiracy theorists miss the red pillars miss is that news bending becomes history bending which means your perspective on what’s happening is incomplete unless you’re aware of short and long-term effects of media manipulation at this level because it does something to the minds of the consumers to their perceptions it frames their interpretation of everything else that they get subsequently and so their framing is their bias their prejudice.
Bending Time
Mainstreamers are prejudiced against conspiracy theorists they don’t actually look at what they’re saying they just dismiss it they’re prejudiced conspiracy theorists similarly automatically reject the mainstream and again it’s not the result of skepticism it’s their built-in bias it’s their framework and that framework is an inhibitor when it comes to understanding what’s real and what’s fake and delineating between the two so what we have done is we broke down all the guard rails in the mainstream we remove those from our frame of reference they’re built-in assumptions and from the truther worldview because the alternative is not an alternative as you can see in this diagram the vent it’s a subset it’s not like it’s two different camps no they’re the same team and they’re coming from the same source and one of the things I often point out and I have a graphic for this but basically is that these two are all in the same box but also they have the same triangulator and the triangulator would of course you know be the psyop entertainment complex the media and their triangulation is intended to keep them criticizing each other fighting each other trying to discount each other truthers want to prove the media liars the media wants to censor and shut up the truthers so they’re always engaged in this dialectic but they never look up and recognize that they’re part of the same system.
Conspiracy Theories as Subplots
SUBPLOTS OF THE METASCRIPT: ALTERNATIVE PROGRAMMING
The subplots exist in the world stage fictional universe, so if anybody’s a subplotter, stuck on conspiracies, you can automatically categorize them as having a world stage-centric position.
The world-stage-centric position is very limited.
Many have called our Charlie Kirk as possibly alive, but they assume it was to hide from the “Deep State.” Other claims include nonsense such as “President Trump allowed the Deep State to shoot his ear as part of a ritual.”
Even if they stumble upon the plausibility that something could be staged, they contextualize it within their reality-compromised timeline.
The problem with that view is that it doesn’t consider the scale of an operation required to fake an assassination or a terror attack, and how it’s bigger than Deep State versus MAGA narratives. The staged history involves a level of coordination in which both sides are equally implicated.
If one part of an event appears to be fake, the whole thing has to be scrapped. If you can falsify the story, you have to start with “fake until proven real”. You can’t start with the assumption of a real death. With that as a starting point, one is only entertaining a subplot of the main fake story.
Logically, one must reject the story when there are any serious doubts about its veracity. You must step back. That’s why I say the subtractive position, which is skepticism, is the only logical path forward.Skepticism is based on the concept of suspending judgment until you have all the information, as opposed to automatically believing. That’s why we refer to the mainstreamers as auto-believers.
Right-wing or left-wing psyops, each side benefits from its own type of psychological operation. The left can leverage the death of school children to grandstand about the Second Amendment being a bad thing. Similarly, the mainstream Republicans benefit from Islamic terrorist attacks because that’s their paradigm. Each side benefits from psyops, and neither side calls out those used by the other.
The media is not what the viewing public thinks it is. There are not two different teams. There are not two different perspectives. This is one point of view. Mainstream and alternative are the same point of view. They all buy into the same premise. They argue and fight over lies.
THE REST IS AVAILABLE HERE (FREE):