How Can We Confidently Call News Fake?
Autohoaxer Methodology Explained
Why should we care that the media augments our reality with fiction?
Mindwar awareness is another level of situational awareness. We need to know about scammers and manipulator tactics. Mindwar inoculation, the sort provided by Infinite Plane Radio, offers protection from psychosomatic drone sickness, chemtrail lung, pointless fear, and paranoia.
All psyops occur in the bigger context of the Mindwar. The controllers of big government and media have already won the war on perception. See 2020, 9/11/01, and the NASA science fiction space program are all examples of the totalitarian scope of the establishment's control over individual perception.
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." - William J. Casey, CIA Director
Media fundamentalism leads to politizing your life, accepting or parroting opinions that alienate and divide one socially. It enters one into the Mindwar space.
The Metascript consists of Umbrella Stories, beneath which psyops are given context. For example:
Nukes
Pandemics
Wars
Space Travel
These influence all other smaller stories. They are in the same context as the rest.
Can We Be Confident in Claiming Media Fakery?
Informed Disbelief weighs more than Low Information Belief
Low Information Disbelief is as indefensible as Low Information Belief
Skepticism allows for the freedom to say I don’t know. Believers are impulsive and reactive when it comes to believing the right things. Skeptics are informed nonbelievers or Knowers.
How do we know? We weigh the claims and reject the burden of proof
“I don’t know” doesn’t negate the truthfulness or accuracy of a claim. Only information does that. It’s an appeal to ignorance, and if you don’t know does not mean it is not known or knowable.
“I wasn’t there” is not an argument. “I’m not in the stratosphere so I can’t tell you for sure if it’s contrails or chemtrails” is a fallacious statement.
Media lies. Auto-belief without evidence is not warranted.
(See “The School Shootings That Weren’t” by NPR, where the media accidentally self-debunked 235+ mass shootings.)
Key Distinctions Between Categories of Claim Makers:
Auto-believers are Low Information Believers (mainstream believers)
Auto-disbelievers Low Information Non-Believers (conspiracists and truthers)
(Examples: drone believers, fake panda conspiracists, people who accept absurdities like drone invasions without enough evidence, Qanon are all “low-information”)
Autohoaxers are Informed Non-Believers, or, if the facts support a claim, informed believers, which is better put as “knowers.”
WHAT DO WE KNOW?
We know for certain that fake news aggregates, piles up unchallenged, and the resulting accretion is called “history.” “Lies agreed upon,” as Napoleon Bonaparte described it.
Fake Until Proven Real IF:
there are extraordinary claims
hoax indicators
ready-made political agendas
crisis actors
relevant predictive programming
Why not “Real until proven fake?”:
Media cannot pass the burden of proof to its viewers. It’s illogical. Not to mention it’s their job to provide the information.
How can low-information believers claim it’s real without accounting for the Frame of Reference of the media organization?
All news agencies assume previous fake news to be true and are therefore reality-compromised.
They are misinformed by fakery
Netflix's concurrent and predictive programming
A Psyop is a movie. A simulated news event. This merging of real and fake is the Standard Operating Procedure of controlled media.
For example, Luigi Mandione and The Madness:
I watched The Madness before the shooting happened, knowing it would have predictive programming for future fake news. I selected it because it was the #1 movie and therefore has the reach to be a likely vector for propaganda messaging tied to upcoming fake events.
The Madness features 3-D printed guns. Luigu used a ghost gun.
A CEO is executed in The Madness and he’s the villain in the story. (Obviously based on Elon Musk).
Popular conspiracy journalist Laura Loomer was in it as Lauren Jennings
The leader of “The Forge” seems to be a mashup of Nick Fuentes, leader of America First, and online provocateur Stew Peters. (Peters had claimed there were threats on his life. The leader of The Forge is assassinated. This also foreshadows the recent attempt on Nick Fuentes’ life).
Drills and Psyops generally happen at the same time.
Drills are movies.
Movie Directors serve as Metascriptors, delivering the Predictive Programming for future events. Christopher and Jonathan Nolan are two such Metascriptors (They have a third brother, a hitman with codename Oppenheimer).
Batman Dark Knight Rises: Batman tells his partner to wear a mask when working alone. He insists, “It’s not for you, it’s to protect the people you care about.” Just like 2020. And on cue, Batman hands him a spiked Covid19-like ball shaped smoke bomb:
“Count to 5 then throw,” he instructs.
The COVID-19-looking smoke bomb creates a mushroom cloud.
I take this to mean: 2020, Covid, count five years (2025) and we’ll get the nuke. NOT coincidentally, Christopher Nolan directed Oppenheimer ten years later and Jonathan Nolan did Fallout.
How it works:
Imagination and the subconscious are targeted by entertainment media and
News media target the logical mind
All major movies reinforce the Umbrella Stories like the “space program,” fake nukes, fake pandemics, and fake war. Every fake shooting and every mass casualty drill must have a script.
The Umbrella Stories would allow the scriptwriters to project years into the future. They are building a model of reality, an interpretation, and performing it with simulated news events that drive the historical narrative--day by day.
Our Newsbent Reality
According to my model, history is at least 33% fake.
Calling news fake, and noticing glitches does not mean reality is fake.
All the connections with entertainment and future fake events are the result of News Bending, not “simulation” glitches. We are seeing through the propaganda matrix, not The Matrix itself.
LEARN MORE:
SIGNED COPIES: https://inciter.shop/
TIM OZMAN,
IPR HOST
You’re absolutely right, Tim. This is an interesting article, and I particularly enjoyed the part about the umbrella stories. I might frame it a bit differently: these are the overarching narratives that define societal structure. They play a key role in shaping both unity and division within society. Whether people fully believe in these stories or polarize against them, the critical point is that they dominate discourse and perception.
You provided some compelling examples, like nuclear weapons, pandemics, and wars. It’s striking how these narratives are constructed, in a theatrical fashion. For instance, with recent wars, such as in Ukraine and Gaza, there’s this sense of exaggeration or fabrication. While there might be some real casualties, the overarching narratives is scripted—like the “dusty babies” or “men in buggies flying over borders.” It feels absurd yet carefully designed to provoke emotional reactions.
When it comes to pandemic narratives or space travel, a similar pattern emerges. These topics seem to be enveloped in heavy propaganda, blending elements of truth with larger scripted frameworks. As you pointed out, even mundane events, like a car accident, can be incorporated into a meta-narrative, steering perception toward a pre-defined conclusion. This makes it difficult to discern reality from fiction—but maybe that’s the point. Ultimately, it’s not the individual events that matter; it’s the overarching story being sold.
I also agree with your observation that news, like education, is less about conveying objective reality and more about shaping a worldview. Both act as tools to build a “map” of reality, similar to what Baudrillard described in Simulacra and Simulation. The map is not the territory; it’s a construct imposed on us to frame our understanding. This applies not only to the examples you mentioned but also to climate change. A flood or heavy rainfall becomes part of a global narrative about an impending climate disaster, leading to calls for international cooperation and increased taxation. From a societal standpoint, it’s a clever strategy.
Regarding predictive programming, I think it plays a role but not as prominently as some suggest. The media system itself provides a constant stream of material to reinforce these meta-narratives. Movies and shows might contribute, but they’re just tools within a much larger apparatus. The real influence lies in the repetition and emotional engagement of these narratives across all media forms, ensuring everyone becomes part of the script, whether or not they’ve seen a particular film or series.
Lastly, I agree with your thoughts on historical narratives. Much of what we learn, especially in school, feels overly simplified or blatantly skewed. The way history is taught often emphasizes certain “evil” figures or periods while glossing over nuance or alternative perspectives. For example, the glorification of certain eras, like the so-called “Golden Age,” often ignores the broader context, including who truly benefited.
Your post does an excellent job of highlighting how narratives shape perception and maintain control. It’s essential to question these constructs, recognize their purpose, and remain critical of the “maps” laid out for us. Great work!