Did JLB Strawman Predictive Programming Analysis?
Let's discuss JLB's "Did Shane Gillis know about the Trump shooting AHEAD of time?"
In JLB’s “Did Shane Gillis know about the Trump shooting AHEAD of time?” he suggests that “predictive programming” isn’t scripted, citing an example of comedian Shane Gillis making a Trump assassination joke with a seeming allusion to Pennsylvania. He asks of Shane Gills was “in on the assassination attempt.”
I would call this a strawman. Predictive Programming exists. Concurrent programming exists. This is not debatable. The question some still ask is, what is it?
Trump assassination jokes and media foreshadowing have been commonplace since 2016 (references to this event go back even further, such as Back To The Future’s Biff Tannen or the racist Senator in Machete (2010). These are not only jokes but are feeding a narrative that reached a crescendo in the weeks leading up to the much-anticipated public headwound on the right of Trump’s head, as we expected.
Why were expecting it? Because Autohoaxers know what Predictive and Concurrent Programming are. Bottom line. We’re not confused about the structure of media and how it supplanted religion and created our shared worldview and our shared history as an instrument of governance.
To suggest Shane Gillis or any actor or comedian needs to be in the know is fallacious. It’s like saying:
“No way they could have faked the moon landing because 400,000 contractors would have been in on it.”
“No way 9/11 was staged. Too many people would have been in on it.”
“No way the news is scripted because all the reporters would be in on it.
“No way they faked the nuke because all those soldiers would have to be in on it.”
This is a strawman misprepresentation of what skeptics are saying. Autohoaxers are skeptics. Truthers are only skeptical of the other side and not of the MSM premise itself. The MSM presents a worldview. Skepticism should begin with rejecting its claims without evidence, not believing what’s on the screen, and then finding evidence after, which is what we see. People are choosing how to believe the assassination attempt happened rather than asking if it even did happen.
Autohoaxers are skeptical of the media's intentions and purpose. When engaged in a psychological operation, the media don't report random facts but construct stories. They don’t inform viewers but conform them to a prefabricated story.
Similarly, directors aren't filming randomly, making up scenes as they go, but are elaborately scripting dramas where every scene is shot, reshot, storyboarded, and edited. Directors aren't free-styling it on multimillion-dollar psyop-entertainment-complex blockbuster films. Every detail is pre-planned.
The Synchromystic will say there is no way such a huge event could be scripted. I disagree. Every military operation is “scripted” and generally the subject of repeated drills. The soldiers don’t know what the commanding officers know, yet the entire operation involving hundreds of specialized soldiers gets accomplished.
Metascriptors and script readers are not the same. Generals and soldiers are both in the mindwar, but only the Generals know what’s going on.
The question is, what are these instances of synchronized messaging?:
a ) coincidences
b) scripted,
c) something more?
Let's examine these:
a) There are naturally occurring coincidences. However, it is axiomatic to say there are no coincidences in world stage psyops, just as in movies, the plot develops according to script and not random occurrences. Therefore, if it's connected to a psyop/hoax/simulated event, then you can rule out coincidence. This leaves scripting and "something more."
b) Scripted means authored, written, and performed by man. The space program is an example of metascripted drama and pageantry played out by lower-level dupes.
On the ground, Earth-based psyops follow the same pattern. Metascript directors like James Cameron or Stanley Kubrick operate with greater understanding than the actors, who may be in the dark. The same goes for Astronauts operating on a higher plane of understanding than the NASA workers on the ground. NASA's Apollo 11 Flight Director admitted that the simulations were foolproof and that ground control would not be able to discern real from simulation.
c) Something more? This rules out human intent and agency at work. "Something more" could be Bigfoot, an Alien, God, or a Supercomputer AI, and we are within a simulation. I would categorize "or something more" as an instance of the Divine Fallacy, in which one adds a higher power to fill in for what they cannot explain. Science Fiction author Arthur C. Clarke wrote, "...any sufficiently developed technology is indistinguishable from magic." I would add that just because something appears to be magic or inexplicable doesn't mean it is.
To use the stage magic show analogy, if you're in the audience, you will be foolable by optical illusions, misdirection, and other contrivances. However, if you went backstage and read the magician's manual and perhaps spied on a rehearsal, you would know how the tricks were performed. Yet, even if you remained seated, do you automatically assume the tricks you couldn't figure out resulted from "something more,” i.e., magic? No. We recognize that our ignorance is what makes their trick work.
As the days pass and more examples of predictive and concurrent programming within the closed system of World Stage pile up, it will become increasingly difficult to deny that predictive programming is the standard operating procedure for mass mediation as its true intent is the modification of the collective psyche via conditioning, repetition, and propagandizing using an advanced marketing strategy.
In conclusion, Shane Gillis was either fed a line or copied what has already been a mainstay of Trump-era comedy. In other words, it was a coincidence or predictive programming. I suspect the latter because of the conspicuous timing. There’s no room for divine inspiration or any other explanations. Metascript analysis reveals how the news is bent, how history is made, and why billions believe the same lies from the same liars, time after time.
Read Autohoaxology 101 if you have not. I’ll be launching my promotional events as soon as possible:
ORDER NOW:
