There have been a few Anons to have claimed victim status when offended by my free speech. By “Anons” I don’t mean anonymous Internet users generally, but specifically those who hide under the banner of Anonymous, wearing Guy Fawkes masks and using frog avatars.
Anonymous people can't claim personal victimhood if they are denying accountability for their own statements. Anons don’t own what they say because that requires an individual identity.
Recently, a frog Anon openly wept over a “hit piece” which wasn’t a hit piece against a real person but an abstraction. My opinion was on “race realism”. Ironically, the crying amphibian specifically called me a “shill” for not talking about “race-realism”. So I wrote about it and he claimed I victimized him with my opinions and that I must therefore work for Jews at the ADL and the SPLC.
I am flat-out denying this frog’s feelings.
He cannot claim butthurt feelings until he can be a singular person and not “an Anon”. Anons have no skin in the game. This is the price one must pay to be an unaccountable scared Internet troll. You aren’t supposed to have an ego if you’re an Anon.
Besides, crying is unbecoming of a group with the demonic slogan “We Are Legion.”
MARK 5:9
And Jesus asked him, “What is your name?” He replied, “My name is Legion, for we are many.” —The story of the Gerasene demoniac.
Snowflakes are bad enough. What makes them terrible is they expect others to walk on eggshells around them. Trollflakes are worse. Similar to crybullies, Trollflakes play up their trollishness until they get a reaction they can overreact to. The Trollflake Anon I reference called me out, attacked my credibility, and then cried literal torrents of tears while reading my well-reasoned reply to his criticisms.
Anons aren’t real. Their feelings don’t matter as long as those tears are masked.
Tim Ozman,
IPR HOST